| ▲ | PeterStuer 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Then again, given some even failed to adopt the metric system ... Also, that same tech industry has shown remarcable competence in working around IPv4's limitations. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mahboi 5 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
IPv4 is better than IPv6, and imperial is better than metric. I would like something to replace IPv4, but that thing shouldn't be IPv6 and probably won't be at this rate. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | inglor_cz 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
This is quite similar situation indeed. It was once easier to adopt the metric system when the infrastructure was not yet as developed around the previous ones. Austria-Hungary adopted the metric system in the 1870s. Back then: no cars, no highways, no speeding laws etc. Oxen-drawn wagons in the countryside were not built to a precise spec. Only the railway, the architects and the artillery had to really switch. Ordinary people would still ask the grocer for half a pound of ham in the 1930s. USA in the 1970s would have to remeasure all the land communications etc., or end up with a weird hybrid like the UK. WHat we have in IPv4 and IPv6 is the weird UK-like hybrid... | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||