| ▲ | Maxion 7 hours ago | |||||||
To capture it? Quite a few I'd imagine. The energy you could collect though from one hit is quite low. | ||||||||
| ▲ | myrmidon 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
It's around 1MWh within a fraction of a second. That means very high peak power, making your whole capture infrastructure extremely expensive, but even capturing 100% of an average lightning bolt is worth <$100 in electricity. Which is why nobody even attempts this. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | chii 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
yea, i think the low efficiency (plus how to predict where lightning would hit!). Might as well just put up a wind turbine, since wind is much more predictable, not to mention easier to harvest. | ||||||||