TFA says that over 70% of the comments were negative with the remainder being split between positive and neutral. I'm sure the Times thinks it will rope in new users, but I'm sure the Times is factually wrong.

▲

jibalt a day ago | parent [-]

Comments aren't users. Commenters are statistically biased toward complaints.

▲

thisismyanon2 a day ago | parent [-]

If they're not users what are they? Are you trying to claim that the NYT site is getting brigaded by anti-AI advocates? There are plenty of AI-negative reviews on Apple's app store. Is the App Store publishing bogus complaints too?

I think Occam's Razor applies here. Much like Copilot or Dell's AI computers, nobody wants slop from the NYT. People pay for NYT Cooking specifically for the human curation. Getting slop with a big "we didn't test this recipe and aren't responsible for it" is a net negative in this context.

▲

jibalt a day ago | parent [-]

Sigh. The SET of commenters is not the SET of users.

> Are you trying to claim that the NYT site is getting brigaded by anti-AI advocates?

No, I made very clear what I was claiming: Commenters are statistically biased toward complaints. People without complaints are less likely to comment.

> Is the App Store publishing bogus complaints too?

Too? I said nothing about bogus complaints.

I don't want to insult you so I won't respond further.

P.S.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50242500

OMG

	▲	thisismyanon2 a day ago \| parent [-]
		[flagged]