| ▲ | p-e-w 5 hours ago | |
> SO wasn't a discussion forum, it was wikipedia for programming. They changed what they wanted to be multiple times, and even after they had settled on a policy they didn’t enforce it consistently. | ||
| ▲ | hatthew 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I feel like the "repository of knowledge" identity was pretty clear for around a decade (at least for main Q&A, not Chat or Discussions). It was inconsistently enforced because the volume of low-quality questions exceeded the ability of the "moderators" to enforce it. At its peak, the backlog of questions in the process of being closed was about a full month's worth of question volume (this doesn't include questions that did get closed or questions that didn't yet start the process of being closed). | ||