| ▲ | avidruntime 2 hours ago | |
100%. My POV is really just "if I could fold my MBP into a tablet without any compromise, and that feature costed an extra couple hundred more than an equally specced non-touch MBP, I probably would go for it and barely use it" | ||
| ▲ | gloxkiqcza 40 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
Apple could do this by allowing you to run macOS on an iPad. Magic Keyboard is detachable and doubles as a cover/case. Without it, it's a tablet. With it, it's a laptop with reasonable compromises. SoCs in some iPads are the same as in some MacBooks. It's just software that's letting it down. | ||
| ▲ | dpark 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Yeah. It’s appealing in theory. On windows devices I made that choice a few times. I wouldn’t anymore. If nothing else, the more complex hinges create significantly higher failure risk. | ||