Disingenuous to not mention what plan you are on.

If you are talking about free versions, OpenAI and Anthropic also have a difference between free models and models available to 25$-tier plans.

▲

zarzavat 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No, not free. I'm on a paid plan.

▲

wasabi991011 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Still not saying which paid plan. I don't really understand why you think that doesn't matter. Google is not the only company to have different model availability for different plan tiers.

	▲	zarzavat 24 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		The issue is that they have fully abandoned the Plus plan while continuing to take people's money. Back in March, the Plus plan was marketed as the way to access Gemini 3.1 Pro, their top model. The free plan gave you a tiny quota of their Pro model, and the Plus plan gave you a generous quota, enough for chatting. It was expected that 3.1 Pro would be upgraded to 3.5 Pro whenever that came out, but that model never materialized. When Google finally had a new Pro model, not only did they not apologise for the delay, but they didn't upgrade the Plus plan, which is to this day stuck on this ancient model. Fine, you might say. hey made the Pro model only for the Pro plan. What's the big deal? But why, why, did they stop upgrading the Flash model as well? So we've gone from "The Plus plan lets you access our top model with generous limits" to "The Plus plan only supports a months old second-tier model". I'm sure that Google never explicitly promised that the Plus plan would receive upgraded models, but nevertheless it feels like being scammed.

▲

fastball 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

My workspace account is "Expanded AI Access" and can't access any Gemini 4 models. Disingenuous to ignore the fact that you can't even sign up for Plus/Pro/Ultra on a non-personal account when talking about "what plan you are on".

	▲	wasabi991011 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I didn't ignore anything. I chastised for the missing information and gave a potential reason (which could totally be wrong for who I was replying to, which I acknowledge by saying if). Thanks for sharing your experience though, it's a more substantive piece of information than who I was replying to.