| ▲ | tristanlukens 4 hours ago | |
> Up to 13 more hours than Intel-based MacBook Pro Even though this reveal seems genuinely cool, this stat sounds weird. Why compare it to Intel Macs when the status quo has been Apple Silicon for half a dozen years? | ||
| ▲ | geodel 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
I will compare to my cordless hair trimmer, that damn thing does not even last 10 mins. | ||
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | ipsum2 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
"Up to 2 more hours than an M1 Macbook Pro" sounds less impressive. | ||
| ▲ | Arbortheus 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I expect there’s still a lot of people that haven’t upgraded yet. | ||