| ▲ | jandrese 5 hours ago | |||||||
I am surprised that Starlink didn't eat their lunch. I think the only thing keeping them alive is inertia and the fact that Starlink still has regional lockouts and doesn't work in the most remote parts of the world. | ||||||||
| ▲ | apendleton 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Garden variety Starlink requires a big, expensive, high-powered phased-array antenna, and there are lots of low-power/IoT-type applications served by Iridium for which Starlink is not suitable. Once the Starlink direct-to-cell technology matures, presumably that'll serve those usecases, but it still seems pretty nascent. | ||||||||
| ▲ | yesod 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Under SOLAS, GMDSS equipment is mandatory on ships. Iridium (and Inmarsat) meet that requirement, starlink does not - hence Iridium is still very much around... | ||||||||
| ▲ | labcomputer 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Iridium still has a monopoly on high latitudes, too, AFAIK. Their USP is being the only network that works literally anywhere on the surface of the earth. | ||||||||
| ||||||||