Remix.run Logo
▲ entrope an hour ago

"Closer" in what sense? Does Elon Musk have a markedly more lavish lifestyle than them? Is his retirement safer? How many politicians are campaigning on investigating, regulating and prosecuting the hundred-millionaires? Do media run scare stories about the drug use and sexual promiscuity of the hundred-millionaires, suggesting that they have children from too many partners?

▲mrbombastic an hour ago | parent | next [-]

If we taxed him a little more i might be able to afford a tiny violin to play to mourn his unfair treatment

▲tclancy an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

If you’re saying he doesn’t, that’s a really strong argument for redistribution then, isn’t it? If he don’t need it, let’s spread the love around. And spare me the job creation story.

▲entrope an hour ago | parent [-]

He doesn't have a markedly more lavish lifestyle than the hundred-millionaires, but I don't want to live in a country where the government takes stuff that it (or some majority) decides the current owners don't need, and you shouldn't want to either. I think the US and world are better off with Elon Musk in control of those companies, and with those companies having lots of capital to work with. A side effect of people agreeing with me (although I'm not invested in those companies directly) is that his paper wealth is huge.

So, no, I don't think "he doesn't act like he needs it" is at all a good argument for redistribution.

▲whoanoway an hour ago | parent [-]

[dead]