| ▲ | gherkinnn 2 hours ago | |
I have a soft spot for such folklore. Strictly speaking, much doesn't hold up to scrutiny but I see no wrong with wild conjecture for the fun of it. For starters, some catastrophes do shine through more recent history: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_flood_myths - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcanic_winter_of_536 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_Without_a_Summer Then, Nuclear Evangelism is a fun idea, proposing a religion teaching us to stay away from nuclear waste for 10k years: https://www.nahomatsuda.com/nuclear-evangelism Or you can poke around linguistics - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_linguistics - https://www.deadlanguagesociety.com/p/does-your-name-belong-... The Arthurian legends and Robin Hood are two English-speaking examples of folklore snowballing into what we have today. I bet James Bond will join them in a few hundred year's time. | ||
| ▲ | rramadass 28 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
You are mixing up a lot of timelines (mostly in AD) and hence not a good comparison. I am talking about records from 5000-7000BC (deducing from Sanskrit literature) by which time they had already been orally transmitted for eons. So they are truly ancient with layers upon layers of grafting of realities/myths/stories over time. | ||