Remix.run Logo
▲ whatever1 an hour ago

Where? I am not aware of any significant business improvement on the actual bottom line.

We all feel more productive. But did your rust rewrite or my fancy react dashboard produce more value?

▲Hnrobert42 an hour ago | parent [-]

I advise a B2B startup that went from 4 developers to just the founder, who is technical but not a developer. It is now profitable and delivering just as many features with arguably better security. N=1

▲zrobotics 25 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

So how is this startup going to be a value add long term? If they can cut all the devs, what moat is there? What's stopping their customers from just prompting their own model?

Seriously asking, why would this look like a good business model to be in? If they don't need anyone besides a technical non-developer to create the product, why would this look like a good business? If it's B2B, then most of their customers will have that type of IT person on staff.

▲fn-mote 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

A dry cleaner and a car wash can be a good business. Outsource things that are not your core competency. A moat means you can defend it better, but in this case your business can capture the value of them not having the IT person on staff and not having to spend the tokens. It’s a good old fashioned business.

▲marcus_holmes 7 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

The question is "what business value is AI driving?" and the answer was "a solo founder cut all the devs and still delivered a product".

Separate question: "now that AI is here and development isn't a moat any more, how does a business defend itself from competition?"

That second question is a direct result of AI. Five years ago the amount of cost and effort spent on software development was a moat. Now it's not. So that answers the first question completely, I think.

As for the second question - market sector knowledge, customer contacts and industry reputation, all the usual non-technical things that make a moat. Also, we may now be living in a world where software companies cannot expect to be monopolies in their markets any more. This company will have to compete with many similar competitors for market share, like in most other markets. I think this is a good thing. Less enshittification will ensue.

▲whatever1 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So the price of the product will just fall by 80%, unless nobody else cares to compete.

▲tehjoker 29 minutes ago | parent [-]

This is why capitalism must always find new markets or die btw.

▲bluefirebrand 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A company doing more with less sounds great, but I personally view a shrinking headcount as failing

▲leptons 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

It's going to be funny when AI soon costs 4x or more than it does now, and that non-developer CTO can't understand the slop codebase the AI created.

▲fn-mote 13 minutes ago | parent [-]

I also hope that rising costs return software dev to an elite, lucrative career. I’m not making my 10 years plan based on that theory, though.

Watch what the open weight models can do. Once they can manage your codebase, you’re safe from gouging.