Math is completely abstract and the base rules and mechanics of it are some of the most clear cut and formalised because that’s the entire point of the subject.

Biology is the complete opposite of that.

▲

bijowo1676 an hour ago | parent [-]

we do have high precision microscopes that can see molecules, so it is possible to build closed system with feedback loop that feeds back into AI at very small scales

▲

hungryhobbit an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I don't follow how "we can see tiny stuff" = "it is possible to build closed system"?

Seeing tiny stuff doesn't magically give you enough info for Claude to reason with the system predictably (the way it can with source code).

	▲	sumanthvepa 37 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It can start to reason about what it seems under the microscope. You just need to train it on images and data from microscopes.
	▲	bijowo1676 29 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		the transition is in-silico => in-vitro => in-vivo AI already can do in-silico simulation add microscopes and tiny precision actuators, and we can build closed feedback loop in-vitro system once we have in-vitro, it will be easier to go in-vivo

▲

lifeisloving an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

No its not, this is complete dunning kruger, please provide an example.