| ▲ | littlecranky67 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I didn't say anything about decentralized blockchain or anonymous tokens. We could have a kyc process and a single centralized blockchain run by the stock exchange, which only settles transactions to kyc customers - fraud prevention and tax evasion applies. The real-time trading independent of brokerages, the free information flow of trading volume/direction etc. all benefits and a true, real free market. Right now we have mountain of unneeded intermediaries, that sit and cash in on the data and access. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | RandomLensman 2 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Would you expect exchanges to permit everyone to trade directly? How would you police the consequences of, for example, no entry policing? How would you want to police requirements if everyone is on the exchange or some venue (e.g., around algorithms)? But complexities of any new system aside, what is an example of a cashing in of an unneeded example in terms of an activity? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||