> even for the majority who have documented in writing a full assent to adhere to vehicle codes under public policy

hello sovcit. are you writing this from jail?

▲ jon128 a day ago | parent [-]

No. Absolutely not.

I am not whatever internet meme you think it is you're thinking about.

I am in harmony with "the system".

I am a national as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(22)(B).

  https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1101

My literacy is not an excuse for your bigotry.

You should have stopped reading at the line that indicated you should stop reading, as you are not well-educated in law.

So arrogant bigotry, at that.

▲ gverrilla a day ago | parent [-]

Please show me a single valid court ruling that favours the 'state national' claim.

	▲	jon128 a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		See the section 5.22, Nationalities and 5.23 "designating the natives of the States". For example, Texan, Californian, etc. Note that the URL has a Top-Level Domain of .gov `https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-STYLEMANUAL-2008/html/GPO-STYLEMANUAL-2008-7.htm`
	▲	jon128 a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		"The governments of the United States and one of each of the several states are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other". Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 (1935) "That there is a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of a state, and the privileges and immunities of one are not the same as the other is well established by the decisions of the courts of this country." Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927) "The only absolute and unqualified right of a United State citizen (federal citizen) is to residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States." U.S. v. Valentine, 288 F. Supp. 957