> It isn't "fuckery" as such

§ 215 was fuckery. It was reformed [1]. (Though not repealed.)

> an industry of selling dossiers on individuals, groups, or populations

Agree. But buying reports from data brokers isn't "you scratch my back I'll scratch yours" agreement. That's fuckery again.

To be clear, I'm not denying fuckery is afoot. I'm criticising throwing it out there without an evidenced allegation. Because if we have evidence of fuckery, that’s the priority. If not, it’s the data brokers.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_Freedom_Act