|
| ▲ | linguae 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| On the Windows side, Windows 2000 and XP/Vista/7’s Classic mode, though Aero was quite nice. I’m not a fan of the interfaces from 8 onward, and I didn’t like Luna in XP. On the Mac side, it’s a toss up between the platinum interface of Mac OS 8/9 and Mac OS X Tiger. With that said, I have a work-issued MacBook Pro running Golden Gate as my daily driver, and Liquid Glass is alright. It’s not what I’d prefer if I had a choice, but it’s not a dramatic departure from previous versions of macOS. A Cheetah or Puma Mac OS X user should be able to navigate Golden Gate with ease, mostly. |
|
| ▲ | ericd 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'd say Snow Leopard was peak. |
|
| ▲ | asdff 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think the biggest thing isn't really whatever it is but the act of changing and forcing everyone to change into the new ui that is the disruptive part. It is a combination of window dressing changing but also sometimes functions breaking. It is ironic because software written for developers prides itself generally on maintaining compatibility with say depreciated flags, or if things will be depreciated plenty of notice ahead of time. But that only holds for cli software. GUI software and the OS that all goes out the window. Stuff breaks, workflows break, you have no recourse and in fact they might make it genuinely difficult to go back to an older version. Like this part of it is the shitty part. Never mind how it happens to look. It is the forcing effect. |
| |
| ▲ | setr 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think it’s also because these UI changes are always designed to improve first-impression and first-usage. They are outright hostile to anyone who wants to go fast and get faster — the power user. At minimum the re-arrangement resets any gains you had, and at maximum its irrecoverable because the UI is now fundamentally designed to slow you down. This eventually becomes awkwardly precise complaints about information density and general change; but the underlying issue is I want to go fast and the system says no | | |
| ▲ | ericd 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think the only real solution to this is to switch to an OS with a backing org that has optimization for power users as a first-class goal. I've been liking Omarchy and NixOS for that. I say this as a Mac user since 1989. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | rzzzt 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Windows 2000 / XP in classic mode / XP / Vista / 7. For OSX I'd say High Sierra to Catalina. |
| |
| ▲ | al_borland 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I’d go with Tiger (10.4) for peak OS X, personally. | | |
| ▲ | asdff 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Leopard was better because it introduced spaces. Honestly I think that whole concept (I know windows has something analogous now) was the biggest step change in OS functionality I've seen in my life having started on windows 95. | | |
| ▲ | al_borland 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I never used Spaces much. Apple was actually last to the party on that. Linux had virtual desktops for years at that point, and Windows had them as well through Microsoft PowerToys. I’m pretty sure I was running it on Windows 2000. | |
| ▲ | ant6n an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | The problem is that window management is so atrocious in Mac OS that using multiple desktops is just asking for trouble. Like of you close one window of some software, it will jump to some random other window of the same software on some other desktop. In the end you’ll spend a significant amount of your time trying to “get back” to where you just where (that alt-tab, a possible savior for this in all other OSs, doesn’t work at all on Mac just adds to the UX mess) | | |
| ▲ | asdff an hour ago | parent [-] | | Ehh I'm not to caught up with window management on macos. Bunch of shells open I might use tmux. But otherwise I just keep things in piles organized in spaces, and use expose all to get to whatever I need in the pile. It works much like the piles on my desk in real life so I'm comfortable with it. But it was better in leopard when it was a grid of spaces vs a line of spaces. Less rigidity was nice. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | larsmaxfield 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Liquid Glass was not a "small UI change". It disrupted many accessibility aspects of macOS, so much so that Apple toned down quite a few aspects of the design in subsequent updates, even adding a slider to reduce the effect. [1] The quantity of requests for how to disable Liquid Glass on Apple Discussions is staggering. [2] [1]https://www.macrumors.com/2026/06/09/macos-golden-gate-liqui... [2]https://discussions.apple.com/thread/256227663 |
|
| ▲ | oofabz 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Mac OS 7.6.1 was peak Apple |
|
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | pebble 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Small? |
|
| ▲ | epistasis 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Small improvements don't get much accolades. And for the most part, the UX is so good that most changes tend to be neutral or for the worse. And when you're really attached to something and there's on an unnecessary change, it feels almost like betrayal! I, for one, prefer Apple products because they sweat the small stuff more than the other options, and when they have put in effort to make things worse it's kind of infuriating. I do a bit of desktop Linux work too, and it's OK, but hard to complain when it's all open source volunteer work! Windows is so terrible that I wouldn't even know where to start. What's the point? There's nobody at Microsoft that even gives a damn. |
|
| ▲ | cmoski 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| No, it was Windows 3.11 |
