"if correct, obviously" - please elaborate. I do not see how this is obvious. Or how being correct is obvious.

Not to mention this exact question is being discussed in the article.

Not sure what question you're supposing he asked which was in the article. OP's point seemed to be that correct words written by a human could be effectively the same as correct words written by a machine, supposing the machine managed to be correct by learning from human content. The 'obvious' part is this wouldn't be true if the AI content was incorrect. At least that is what I got.

	▲	112233 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		If restaurant asks to only eat the food you bought there at their tables, the question is not "but what if food from other places also is good"? Can't wikipedia ask who and it what way writes content on their pages?

▲

imdsm 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What about:

Correct information written by AI vs incorrect, biased information written by humans?

	▲	tyromaniac 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		As if AI output isn't biased?