| ▲ | pcstl 7 hours ago | |
I think you misunderstood, I believe they were requesting a layperson-friendly explanation of the conjecture and not a statement of it. | ||
| ▲ | jibalt 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
How is "This proves that EXP != NP", which is false, a layperson-friendly explanation of the actual proof that 3SAT is sub-exponential? | ||
| ▲ | moishe_syzslak 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Whenever someone asks for an ELI5, there's always got to be somebody who further confuses the issue. | ||
| ▲ | caughtinthought 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Which is a separate issue than the one you commented originally | ||