|
| ▲ | pxx 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| ETH (which was commonly thought to be true) implies P≠NP. sure, this proof itself doesn't settle the P/NP problem, but we've lost one of our core beliefs. |
| |
| ▲ | jibalt 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think that statement is too strong -- if ETH was a core belief then its implication P≠NP must also have been a core belief ... but I don't think that those who assumed ETH held it that strongly. As you say, it was commonly thought to be true ... as was P≠NP ... and the latter still is. But is not a "core belief" -- I think virtually everyone believes that they could be wrong, whichever side they're on. |
|
|
| ▲ | mathgladiator 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| At this point, I have no expectations. The future is alien and strange, so time to talk the silicon runes... |
