| ▲ | caughtinthought 8 hours ago | |
It basically just says that NP is not the same as EXP | ||
| ▲ | jibalt 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |
This is not a proof that NP != EXP. NP is poly time reduceable to 3SAT + 3SAT is sub-exponential does not imply that NP is sub-exponential -- the cost of the reduction may be enough to push the conjunction from sub-exponential to exponential. Note https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50253213 which explains it better. | ||