| ▲ | krackers an hour ago | |
Yes. Up until now, it was unknown whether containment of NP in EXPTIME was strict or not. (Obviously you can brute-force all possible witnesses, so any problem in NP can be solved in EXPTIME, it was open whether you could do better than that.) Showing 3SAT (technically #3SAT) can be solved in less than EXPTIME resolves this. It's only slightly subexponential, not even quasipolynomial, but it is a very surprising result. And that too a constructive algorithm. Edit: Apparently not true, the constructive algorithm given may not survive under reductions. See discussion in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50251661 | ||