| ▲ | roddylindsay 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||
It's not so simple: - If by certifying authority you mean a CA/Trust Service Provider, they don't generally publish client information in a central location. - If you mean the actual jurisdictional authority, there are thousands and public records are all over the place. - Websites aren't generally part of corporate filing records. So the agent would still need a way to connect the website to the corporation even after checking the legitimacy of the corporation. - Serving the structured info in an HTTP header that is cryptographically verifiable by the browser itself (via its trusted roots) essentially serves as a distributed database for website identity, which eliminates the need for each agent to come up with its own ad-hoc verification system on the fly (and all the additional fetches that come along with it) | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ameliaquining 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
Can you give a concrete example of the kind of claim you think QWACs would be useful for verifying, that can't be addressed just as well with existing protocols? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||