| ▲ | bee_rider a day ago | |
It might not be tested. But, it would seem very weird if anyone other than the person using the LLM was accountable for the output. | ||
| ▲ | steelframe a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
What if the company has provided the harness, tool execution environment, MCP servers, and LLM provider subscription for the employee to use? What if the company has provided a set of skills and other prompt context that could lead to undesirable behavior in certain unforeseen circumstances? What if the permission prompt the user sees 30 dozen times a day looks like, "OK to execute this random shell script?" Accountability really is hard in this new world. | ||
| ▲ | scarby2 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
An individual software engineer could be held accountable but they are not liable for actions not taken maliciously. | ||