You left out "choice" part. And you confused capitalism with colonialism.

If you did that on purpose, you brought up whataboutism.

- I aint playing your game diverting attention from my comment.

> You left out "choice" part.

Could you rephrase your argument here? I'm having some trouble understanding this sentence fragment.

If you're trying to pull up some old trope about how people are choosing to get shit wages for shit work, then let me remind you that the alternative is starvation . Some fine choice.

> And you confused capitalism with colonialism.

I didn't confuse anything, I linked a famous piece of political theory positing they are interlinked phenomena.

> If you did that on purpose, you brought up whataboutism.

I'm also confused by what you are trying to say here. Who brought up whataboutism? I never spoke of it? Didn't you just bring it up? I'm confused.

> I aint playing your game diverting attention from my comment.

Nobody's diverting. I was directly engaging with it and providing some theory to further understanding and illustrate different perspectives on a term people sometimes get tripped up by.

It is telling you perceive anything but uncritical agreement as diversion. I would encourage you to bring the spirit of curiosity the guidelines call for.