| ▲ | bluerooibos 5 hours ago | |||||||
Yeah this isn't intuitive at all. Both companies have screwed up their naming royally. Maybe that's intentional - I'm sure it doesn't hurt Anthropic to have people using Fable a bit longer than they need to and racking up a huge bill in the process. | ||||||||
| ▲ | scottyah a few seconds ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
They're always very clear about it when a new model comes out. You have to click away a banner to continue using the service. There's not much they can do to make it any more obvious without it being a major hassle for all the people who understand versioning. | ||||||||
| ▲ | cesarvarela 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
It is: Fable 5.5 will be better than Opus 5.5. Opus 6 will be better than Fable 5.5, Fable 6 will be better than Opus 6, etc. | ||||||||
| ▲ | dumberquestions 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
You're comparing different generations, any 5.5 models could be better than any 5.0 model. | ||||||||
| ||||||||