| ▲ | Hamuko an hour ago | |
A rational company would not buy out an employee that they're going to be rehiring. | ||
| ▲ | vineyardmike 20 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
You cannot act with perfect information when you're making an offer to 25% of a company that size. If they were able to and willing to plan this on a per-person basis, they wouldn't be in the position of mass-buyouts. It's very common in these situations to target every org in the company with a goal of X% reduction. If a small fraction of these teams now need extra headcount, easy enough to allow those teams to hire. Usually you don't keep the severance if you return in under X days. I've personally been laid off, only for the post-re-org team to hire several people, including asking to rehire me. It's rare, and those affected should probably plan to find new jobs, but it happens. | ||
| ▲ | bongofizzbuzz 27 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Yes, but companies realise the important cogs much later in the process. | ||
| ▲ | sumtechguy 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
typically in that case the boomerang is they come back but as a consultant. just doing the same thing they were doing before but at a different rate. usually higher to cover health ins plus a bit of a bonus. | ||
| ▲ | fhn 37 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
But with the job market the way it is, they could re-hire at a lower compensation? | ||