| ▲ | codingdave 4 hours ago |
| > I'd be pretty scared. Scared of what, exactly? It looks to me like the site is primarily static content, so operational costs should be reasonable. He could scale down to just static content, and even if traffic decrease, it is not an existential crisis. Or am I missing something? |
|
| ▲ | cael450 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The cost of purchasing the property from digital ocean and the cost of his team. |
| |
|
| ▲ | webdood90 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| How does one pull a 6 figure salary from a blog site in 2026? |
| |
| ▲ | simonw 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Attract an audience of people who make purchasing decisions, then attract sponsors who want to be put in front of those people. Quality of readers is more important than quantity. | | |
| ▲ | dfabulich 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | You're saying that like it's straightforward hard work. But that strategy has been on the decline for years, with no sign of reversing. High-value technical audiences aren't Googling for educational articles, videos, and courses. They're just asking LLMs, and getting answers. Sometimes the LLMs are searching the web, but LLMs approximately never click on the ads. | | |
| ▲ | simonw an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I didn't say it was easy. I'm doing this myself at the moment, so I have a sample size of one showing it's possible. | |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
| |
| ▲ | beepbooptheory 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Run a relatively small political Substack and just bide your time till you get picked to run CBS News. | | |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | moffkalast 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Become an alt right grifter and get paid by billionaires' bots to help destroy democracy. |
|
|
