| ▲ | sobiolite 2 hours ago | |
Good luck, I guess, but in 2026 "CSS Tricks" seems about as relevant as "PostScript Tricks" or "Office Open XML Tricks". Human manipulation of CSS is going to be, at best, a hobby for a few dedicated tinkerers. And I say that as someone who invested a significant amount of the last 20 years getting good at CSS. | ||
| ▲ | petercooper 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
I don't really have a definitive answer, so this is more thinking out loud, but why do the Economist, Spectator, WSJ, NYT, or the like continue to do reasonably well? News is everywhere now, and AI can do a reasonable job guiding me on any economic or political topic I might care about. Yet.. named authors with track records or strong personalities/opinions still seem to draw readers and have value, and maybe CSS Tricks is mildly like that in some niches. | ||
| ▲ | npn an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
??? CSS tricks was never about only css, it also had js, html, design and other tips, too. Pretty useful to catch up with webdev related new features | ||
| ▲ | zulban 43 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I think it's very ominous that their post doesn't even directly mention AI generated CSS. | ||