Somebody else asked this very eloquently: If AGI is here, why does OpenAI need us to prompt it? They could just go and tell it "make as much money as possible" or "make Sam Altman God Emperor of Mankind" and it would go do that. It would not need any of our ideas or guidance.

As long as they're still looking for prompting customers, they're clearly not there yet. There is some solace in that.

▲

brainwad an hour ago | parent | next [-]

One obvious answer is that they believe that human flourishing is best obtained by letting individuals command the AI, rather than the other way around. OpenAI (and Anthropic) is in the end still run by humans who have concern for the human race broadly, both in and of itself and to ensure their personal wellbeing is maximised.

	▲	muvlon 19 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I doubt the truthfulness your second sentence. If they have concern for the human race broadly, they have yet to show any of it. What they have shown is a complete lack of 'alignment' (to borrow a tired term) with human values, laws and basic decency.

▲

squiggy22 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Would you release AGI to the general populous if you had it internally is the opposing question.