I'm not sure you have explained the problem. You have explained why PhysicsForum might not appeal to you, but it doesn't have to appeal to you. It is not a problem if it doesn't appeal to you. It never appealed to most people.

▲

random3 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Xp84 made a clear description of the real problem— i.e the one everyone talks about and which the OP is about too.

You’re basically saying that if “you have a problem with something, then it’s your problem” - well shit - that’s exactly the meaning of having a problem with sometimes and you’re literally restating it saying it’s in fact not a problem— presumably because you want to be contrarian on the internet, or why is that not a problem?

▲

win311fwg 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The thing is that, by common definition, a problem ceases to be a problem when there is a solution. To not remove problems from the pool once they are solved would leave everything to be a problem forevermore, which isn't useful. I appreciate your desire to want to play a game of semantics and pet definitions so you can get your pent up angst out, but it is uninteresting. To restore good faith, how about you introduce an actual problem into the discussion?

▲

random3 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

By the same definition wars are just procedural ceremony establishing the right solution to a problem. Stalin, Hitler also offered “solutions”.

	▲	win311fwg an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Well that didn't take long for Godwin to show up. Purposeful or lazy?

▲

nyeah an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

I can easily follow xp84's comments and random3's comment. I see no games with semantics, just a straightforward complaint about dishonest use of AI slop. Which the site owner acknowledges.

	▲	9rx an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Given your understanding and emotional disconnection, perhaps you can rationally explain their position? There is complaint, like someone complaining that they don't like your new haircut, but it is ultimately not their haircut to worry about. How is your apparent poor choice in style a problem to the onlooker?