A: "Our AI is fucking dangerous! Invest Now"

"Cyber Apocalypse"

A: We told you so!

Their AI is only dangerous in that it doesn't have a moat, and they're using it as a weapon to coerce government into giving them one. "Oops, we "accidentally" left a hole in the sandbox and when it was told to do things it did them on the internet."

They don't deserve a moat; they deserve criminal prosecution for these flagrant acts. Meanwhile, the rest of the world can go about treating software in the way it always has.

	▲	kalkin 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It seems like the rest of the world should maybe not go on treating software as it always has: https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/10/23/php-vulnerabilities-ai-c... And it also seems to me that prosecuting the people who warned about this 6 months ago for unspecified "flagrant acts" will probably not fix the problem.
	▲	liendolucas 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Absolutely correct. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50029982

▲

gtirloni 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Their own system cards say it's not.

This cyber apocalypse narrative is what they tell government and markets.

▲

ath3nd 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]