The TLDR take: now that humans are no longer required for thinking, we will switch to something other than usage of our brains.

Eating, apparently, is completely optional for humans :-/

Just a thing to remember: our intelligence made us the apex predator on this planet. Is there any reason to believe that a superior intelligence, whether man-made or extraterrestrial, won't become the apex predator?

▲

asgraham 3 hours ago | parent [-]

That’s not really what it’s saying. The analogy it draws is between subsistence farmers and subsistence thinkers aka white collar workers/paper pushers etc. The argument would be that repetitive, brainless thinking will no longer be required (not thinking in general), so people will be freed up for currently unimaginable cognitive pursuits.

	▲	lelanthran 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> The argument would be that repetitive, brainless thinking will no longer be required (not thinking in general), so people will be freed up for currently unimaginable cognitive pursuits. That's a facile, superficial "argument" that is currently being made by everyone who is pro-AI when confronted with any claim of AI pushing humans out of the economy. At this point in time, it's reasonable to dismiss the argument rather than engaging it, because each time this argument is made the proponent of the argument is completely mute on the fact that humans work to eat. That's a big underlying counterargument, and no one making the argument is engaging with the counter-argument, they are instead setting up strawman counter-arguments.
	▲	10111001 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		> The argument would be that repetitive, brainless thinking will no longer be required, so people will be freed up for currently unimaginable cognitive pursuits. Like what? 1. AI isn't going to stop at "repetitive, brainless thinking," just ask the math professors. 2. Even if that's true, is everyone capable of these "currently unimaginable cognitive pursuits"? Oh, there will still be cognitive work for the top-0.1% smartest people is little consolation to the other 99.9%. 3. That argument is basically trying to console people with a combination of "trust us" and the underpants gnome business plan ("1. Collect underpants, 2. ?, 3. Profit).
	▲	bayarearefugee 40 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> people will be freed up for currently unimaginable cognitive pursuits. 54% of U.S. adults read below a sixth-grade level.