| ▲ | JojoFatsani 2 hours ago | |
There’s no reason to trust a human any more than an LLM for this. Humans are not 100% accurate and very capable of making crucial factual errors in documentation. Ask me how I know. | ||
| ▲ | foltik an hour ago | parent [-] | |
There’s a _very_ good reason. Humans have a much richer mental mental model of the codebase, design decisions, external factors, etc. Of course Humans can make errors when translating that to English. But if you’ve read any amount of Claudish it should be obvious that interpolating the code to documentation with an LLM typically produces a significantly worse result in almost every way. Except for superficially “sounding” correct. | ||