| ▲ | hau 5 hours ago |
| That's a good way to make claims about existence of a trivial exploit in the wild falsifiable. |
|
| ▲ | jgalt212 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > A reminder that this cannot falsify the existence of an exploit, trivial or otherwise. No, it's a not a zero knowledge proof. But if the site owner is a generally trustworthy person, then I feel that this effort is strong proof the exploit is not trivial. |
|
| ▲ | akerl_ 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| A reminder that this cannot falsify the existence of an exploit, trivial or otherwise. It can only show you if someone has used an exploit against this server. |
| |
| ▲ | muvlon 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It cannot even show that. The server can lie (trivially). | | |
| ▲ | tylergetsay 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | The block chain can't though once the coins are transferred | | |
| ▲ | akerl_ 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | That assumes the key is actually on the server. | | |
| ▲ | mcmoor 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I assume even if it isn't, attacker could deface the website so heavily everyone would know they win. | | |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | hau 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Sure. Also, we have to trust owner of the site. So it cannot show anything, strictly speaking.
Still, it maybe puts a price on exploit demo. Some say "it goes around twitter", "bots are probing and exploiting it", "it's a biggest thing ever in cybersec history, invest in AI now". Some say "it's a fud". Are these 500$ laying on a ground for anyone to take? |
|
