| ▲ | tracerbulletx 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Literally the entire premise of the article is that it's going slow everywhere but in software. To think otherwise is to be really myopic about how the rest of the world outside of tech operates. And in any case 20 years isn't that slow. The only things that happen faster that that will be things like adobe goes out of business. And let's say AI helps us develop medicine and robotics and better factories and all the other things that would have a big impact a lot faster.. just human trials could take a decade before you really see that much change. Will it have a wider impact faster than computing its self, or the internet? Maybe? Maybe not. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | password54321 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
If a lot of jobs were still manufacturing jobs I would agree, but we are in a service economy that uses computers as the main tool. So I don't see how it won't come into effect fairly soon into other areas of work. You can't measure impact by profit alone so I don't find the article particularly interesting anyway. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | benatkin 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Do you think those offering professional translation service were obsessed with AI? Or chess players? The rest of the world doesn't get to decide... | |||||||||||||||||