Remix.run Logo
▲ ivanjermakov an hour ago

> fits so much better in "regular" company/organization projects

How so? I used both at work and they're functionally the same.

▲myko 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I found it much easier to organize repos hierarchically with GitLab. Permissions also seemed easier to setup.

▲tyingq 3 minutes ago | parent [-]

Gitlab is terrible at cross-group permissions if you use dedicated or self-hosted. Because gitlab.com is made to keep top level groups separate (separate tenants). Things like cross-group MR approval, use of the built-in artifact repositories, terraform module registry, gitlab components, and so on...is very messy...so many granular cross-group allows you have to turn on.

▲IshKebab an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah I agree. There are only very minor differences.

▲koolala an hour ago | parent [-]

Isn't being able to self host it on your company network a big important feature? Like for all the non-public branches and projects you keep internal. Gives you the same UX for everything.

This sounds pretty annoying though: https://docs.gitlab.com/administration/license_usage/

▲radlad 31 minutes ago | parent [-]

It is important for some companies. https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.22/admin/inst...