Remix.run Logo
▲ zkmon 7 hours ago

The concepts such as "appreciating", "beauty" etc are all artificial. You have what you have. There is nothing to appreciate or not appreciate. You. should take care of yourself and your folk. That's pretty there to it.

▲bemtevi 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That doesn't make any sense. What do you mean by 'artificial'?

Humans 'appreciated' 'beauty' for centuries. Obviously, we've evolved the ability to do so and the word 'beauty' carries meaning for people and is an effective way to describe their sensory experience and interpretation.

Attemtping to negate the experience of beauty and appreciation through a poorly-formulated behaviouralist remark is akin to a teenager saying that they can't touch a table because touching is just repelling and we never actually touch anything because it's just repellent forces. In both cases, the new formulation is completely irrelevant and doesn't remove the actual meaning from the word.

I'm guessing that the motivation of your phrasing is rooted in a psychological trick that you're using because you're miserable with the fact that other people are experiencing joy through beauty and you've either not the time or not the inclination to do so. A sad perspective indeed.

▲mym1990 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So is every other “concept” in the world, doesn’t make them useless. You can “appreciate” yourself and your folk in a way that makes you more likely to take care of yourself and them. Scars can often have very negative effects on self esteem, and are a real mental hurdle for some people, are those feelings invalid?

▲chrismorgan 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My wife is currently developing some stretch marks due to pregnancy. I intend to appreciate them for a great many years to come.

▲ 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲tgv 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

▲croniev 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It is only your straw-people that propose this kind of relativism. This was about gaining a perspective for appreaciating scars, as they carry memories. It is pointing at the beauty of scars. It is not inverting the meaning of the word, but aiming it at something thus far hidden. The fact that some scars for some people carry heavy trauma does not defeat the point in question.

Also, don't forget that there is no objective criterion for beauty - it is a judgment call. Therefore it is also mediated by language. Even if you correctly see that changing words does not on its own change the world, you are shooting past the target in denying that they have any unique power.

▲tgv 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> This was about gaining a perspective for appreaciating scars

Yeah, and that's trying to make it sound good. It doesn't change the scar. They want you to trick yourself into thinking is is pretty and nice and sweet and, probably, meaningful.

> they carry memories

No, they don't. They may remind you of something.

> something thus far hidden

How was it hidden?

> Therefore it is also mediated by language

No, it isn't. Beauty is a word expression a sensation. The language doesn't mediate the sensation.

> [words] they have any unique power

As I wrote. So you're the straw person? Anyway, the assumption that you should be able to trick yourself into thinking something is beautiful is just as valid as the assumption that it will change the power of the word for you. The euphemism carousel is a vivid example of that.

It's positivity for the heck of it, to get clicks. In internet parlance, it's gas-lighting yourself.

▲ant6n 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

scar != tumor

▲harvey9 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The charitable interpretation is that they meant the scar left after a tumor was removed but they have not argued the point very well.

▲tgv 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The post speaks negatively about the tumor that was where the scar now is. Why didn't they consider it beautiful?