| ▲ | netsharc an hour ago | |||||||
Well, whoever picked the name HTTP2Shell certainly didn't use any intelligence, artificial or genuine. It's so meaningless, broad and undescriptive of the actual issue. No it probably doesn't affect an HTTP server with nothing else behind it, so why is HTTP being blasted? You might as well call it Exploit Pro Max... | ||||||||
| ▲ | CharlieDigital an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Feels like the goal was sensationalism. | ||||||||
| ▲ | reddozen 26 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
The author clearly used super intelligence. | ||||||||
| ▲ | techpression 17 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I immediately thought HTTP/2 was having a bad day somehow. Might I suggest Software2Shell to be less confusing. | ||||||||
| ||||||||