Remix.run Logo
▲ jck86 an hour ago

To what extend do these "smart" products state how, when and what data they are collecting and selling?

Isn't it high time for legislation that at least makes it clear on the box what kind of sensors and integrations it has and how bad the product is privacy wise?

Also, shouldn't corporate spying disguised as automated content recognition and classification be limited or outright be banned?

And all this connected garbage should by law be able to function with the cord cut and without registration, and if an update negatively changes the advertised product characteristics the customer must be allowed to return it for full paid price even if it is 10 years old. Force the manufactures to make statements on the "box" about the features, the support duration and level, and the privacy characteristics.

Why don't politicians care about this?

▲thatsabadlook 34 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

They don't care because of several reasons. 1. They get paid not to 2. They are told not to.

Alot of this spying ends up producing valuable data for different agencies to purchase which otherwise they cannot legally obtain without a warrant. Sure some of it has some commercial value, but a lot of it is probably more valuable for domestic spy operations.

▲chiengineer3 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

I have heard enough send 18 billion to Israel

▲throwaway20222 21 minutes ago | parent [-]

I miss the days when these low effort comments were frowned upon here.

▲gessha 14 minutes ago | parent [-]

People complaining about orange site degradation are probably as old as the site itself.

▲hnlmorg 3 minutes ago | parent [-]

Doesn’t mean it isn’t true