| ▲ | quietFerry94 2 hours ago |
| That pre-determined value idea is exactly local hidden variables, and Bell's inequality rules it out, Aspect's 1982 CHSH experiment measured the violation. |
|
| ▲ | caturopath an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| To be precise, Bell's inequality rules out a local hidden variable theory. Pilot wave theories/Bohmian mechanics is an attempt to describe a nonlocal hidden variable theory of quantum mechanics. |
| |
| ▲ | antonvs an hour ago | parent [-] | | To be even more precise, it rules out hidden variable theories that satisfy Bell locality, i.e. the assumptions that the theorem makes. Superdeterminism and retrocausality both allow for local hidden variables - it’s just that they don’t satisfy Bell’s assumptions. |
|
|
| ▲ | mono442 38 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| it doesn't if you assume superdeterminism |
| |
| ▲ | salsa_catsup 22 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I don't understand the superdeterminism idea. Wasn’t that already the classical/Newtonian view - that everything was predetermined, a universe of billiard balls following their destiny exactly? | | |
| ▲ | MattPalmer1086 14 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Newtonian is just plain determinism. One thing causes another, but does not imply things are fixed in any particular way. Superdeterminism implies that things are fixed in advance in such a way that the things we "choose" to measure always looks as if there are no local hidden variables (e.g. Bell's inequality) even though there are. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | antonvs an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| If you saw that in section 15, the very next paragraph covers Bell. |