| ▲ | tintor 4 hours ago |
| This looks very bad on OpenAI. What is next? Power and water company suspending your account if your home and car are not streaming enough telemetry. I am glad that open models are closing on frontier. |
|
| ▲ | technion 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Claude is absurdly sensitive to anything that touches cyber, and threatens bans if it gets a whiff of a pentest going on. it wouldnt surprise me if openai had a similar approach. Yesterday I joked that claude gave me a cyber stop for asking how to make the anime girl video for an exploit, but it was a thing that happened. Meanwhile im trying to convince people around me that having grok nudify people isnt "fine" just because grok says it is. Its wild where the lines a drawn. |
| |
| ▲ | LoganDark an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm in the new CVP, and even Mythos gave me a cyber stop just for creating an MCP server that can remotely connect to my Steam Frame to run commands. It must've thought I was trying to create a centralized malware or something. Not even sure why Mythos even still exists when it's identical to Fable in every way, including refusing to do stuff that looks like it could ever be repurposed into unapproved use cases. | |
| ▲ | jasomill 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Tastelessness aside, this seems perfectly rational to me. Unlike reverse engineering for the purpose of developing security exploits, "nudification" doesn't meaningfully expand the capabilities of malicious actors with access to free online porn and Photoshop. | | |
| ▲ | AnneTrotter 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Actually violating one person is fine, but doing anything associated with a specific industry that has applications for harm and help is not? That's like saying it's fine to beat someone up and take their lunch, but it's not fine to learn how locks work. | | |
| ▲ | diogocp an hour ago | parent [-] | | It's fine to imagine what your lunch looks like, even if that makes you feel that your dietary privacy has been violated. |
| |
| ▲ | breakingcups an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | That's one of the weirdest takes on here in a while. I can develop security exploits myself just fine without the use of AI. Many people don't have the capability to use Photoshop and free online porn to deepfake someone else they might or might not personally know into a realistic video... |
|
|
|
| ▲ | alfiedotwtf 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| With Kimi K3.1 Pro, today WAS the day they actually caught up. I’ve been saying this for the past few months - once the inflection point happens (such as today), it’s only a matter of 2 years when American closed models won’t be able to catch up with Chinese open models |
| |
|
| ▲ | tosti 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Bad on OpenAI? The account got suspended. This reflects horribly bad on Samsung! |
| |
| ▲ | fdw 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The headline is misleading, but the "article" is only five screenshots of Twitter posts. Someone used AI to decrypt the Samsung TV's firmware and found always on listening, classification, lots of privacy nightmares. Then their (the hacker's, not Samsung's) OpenAI got suspended for "Cyber Abuse". | | |
| ▲ | tosti 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Right, but still: OpenAI provided a service and it's up to them to determine acceptable use. Samsung sells a $3000 (or actually $2999,95) TV and you get big brother watching you. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |
