| ▲ | hmartin 2 hours ago | |
Thank god it has opinionated quirks that old timers dislike. Otherwise we'd still be stuck in the complete dumpster fire that was the python packaging/venv we had for the previous 20 years. | ||
| ▲ | otherme123 36 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
Old timer here: uv is not the first opinionated tool to manage Python packaging. It is build learning from other tools right and wrongs. I now use uv for everything because its quirks are less disruptive than quirks from previous tools that I also tried and disliked for being a bit too much for a very small gain. What you call "dumpster fire", I call "steps towards uv", maybe even better tools in the future. | ||
| ▲ | rcleveng 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
True, before UV the only way to package python was a container. | ||