| ▲ | anonymous908213 5 hours ago |
| I could do without every memory bug getting a cute sensational name and marketing push, I have to say. |
|
| ▲ | aaronbrethorst 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| We should start naming them like hurricanes: NIST creates a list of alphabetical names and assigns any CVE >= 9.0 with a name. Vulnerability Alex (CVE 9.4) |
| |
| ▲ | cowlevel 6 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | CVE scores are already inflated because it looks good for their discoverers. | |
| ▲ | ks2048 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Vulnerability Zzyzx in a week | | | |
| ▲ | duxup an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | "Oh man, Jan really ruined my weekend." I actually kinda like how that works. |
|
|
| ▲ | lovich 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| that ship sailed a while ago. Rowhammer is the first one I can remember |
| |
| ▲ | vinkelhake 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Let's not forget about heartbleed! | | |
| ▲ | judge2020 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Back in the email days the virus authors named them, e.g. YouAreAnIdiot, ILoveYou | | | |
| ▲ | mhio 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That was the first exploit logo I can recall | | |
| |
| ▲ | card_zero 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Rowhammer was kind of special, surely, what with being based on a physical design flaw? |
|