Kimi is so much more blunt and argumentative than USA models.

it's so funny, it will say things like. "We've already been over this 3 times and you refuse to accept my advice, asking the same question another way won't change the answer."

So funny

▲

taikon an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Haven't gotten to try it yet but that'd be a breath of fresh air. Too used to LLMs flip flopping at the slightest hint of challenge.

▲

hgoel an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I always appreciate when a model does that. It's amusing, but also having it be argumentatively wrong is a lot less annoying than being sycophantically wrong.

▲

seunosewa 39 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I don't like tools that intentionally annoy me.

	▲	hgoel 17 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		My reasoning is that if something is argumentatively incorrect, it is much easier to drill down to its misunderstanding and correct it On the other hand, if it's sycophantically incorrect, it'll just change its "mind" while potentially maintaining the misunderstanding, leading to increasingly strange behavior. I think I'm pretty used to my tools making me want to throw them out the window sometimes :) Even before AI that was a common occurrence from either a lack of knowledge on my end, or many software people having no regard for their users' time.

▲

Aerroon 29 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

You can add a line to your system prompt to be like that. You can basically get it to roleplay whatever you want (but only if you can give it sys prompts).

▲

jameson 37 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

It could be the system prompt

	▲	SV_BubbleTime 19 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I like the anthropic has $1 trillion riding on really good models with really specific system prompts. It does make a difference. I asked Fable in Claude code to design a UI. Absolute trash. Switched over to Claude design using fable, really liked the result. Seems pretty obvious. The only difference is the prompt and some harness.