|
| ▲ | slyrus 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The fact that they did it in the beginning and are doing it now makes the whole “well, there was a period of time when they didn’t do this” seem like a minor footnote to the notion that “they’ve always done this”. Even though the statement isn’t strictly true, it sure seems like the cynicism is warranted now and, with the benefit of hindsight, was back then too. |
| |
|
| ▲ | cowlevel 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What's the evidence they stopped? |
| |
| ▲ | Haranrk 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Information meta has on me - instagram reel viewing data Information google has on me - my entire life Yet meta ads are far more eerily relevant. This could imply two things
- a) Meta’s recommendation team is exponentially better (unlikely) b) Google doesn’t use gmail and workspace data for ads | | |
| ▲ | cowlevel an hour ago | parent [-] | | Meta tracks you on every page that has any Meta script, such as a Facebook like button. They're just better at tracking than Google is, amazingly, because meta plays dirtier. |
| |
| ▲ | bensyverson an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | The best evidence is just how comically bad their ad targeting is vs Meta |
|
|
| ▲ | bensyverson an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I don’t think it’s conspiratorial to question how strong the firewall was between your Gmail content and Google’s algorithms. Whether or not they actually leveraged that understanding for targeted ads is somewhat beside the point. |