| ▲ | timschmidt 2 hours ago | |
Op did immediately above you i.e.: "nothing to do with malice or exploitability" and when asked to explain you responded with: "Didn't they say it already?" Which any reader can verify they have not at the time of 1:42pm EST Oct 23 2026. | ||
| ▲ | woodruffw 34 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
There are two different things here: there’s code that is vulnerable because of unnecessary complexity, and there is imputing malice or an intent to hide exploitability through complexity. OpenSSL exhibits the former, not the latter. | ||