This doesn't seem particularly notable and is in line with Anthropic and OpenAI's approach of restricting release/access to more capable models.

It is notable in that it’s the first time an open Chinese company openly stated they were reducing intelligence for “safety”.

“Our lock can be picked by the robot.” We ban the robot instead of fixing the lock. It’s shortsighted.

	▲	JoshTriplett 6 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		If we had a technique that would defeat almost every lock in the world, we might be prudent to delay releasing that until people have had time to change the locks. Same general benefit as coordinated disclosure, except it's a big game-theory problem where we're likely to eventually have sufficiently capable defectors.
	▲	vikramkr 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		they're pretty clearly framing it as holding back on the robot and letting is lose slowly to give everyone time to update their locks