I think there are some interesting points there, but your rude, arrogant, and aggrieved tone overwhelms them.

If you decide to edit your tone, I'm happy to discuss more here re: filesystem transactionality tradeoffs, since that's something I've struggled with in both directions WRT containers.

I'm only responding in kind to GP - no less but not more.

I think you are the one who built an alternate layering system? On mobile, don't like to search rn.

If yes the basics are in the first comment- just not limited to the one RUN statement ofc. And if I do remember how the layers are made then making it transaction-like would be a great dedup saver eg for adding a static rarely changed artifacts - there could be essentially a ~one layer for how many you want images.

Implementation wouldn't be so difficult - you just stop committing until TRAN END; but the main is too provide a mental model for a not very experiencied dev how this supports his work and makes it more efficient on the storage and execution.