| ▲ | verdverm 7 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If the Ai came back to me with a 1600x improvement (still in pgrust readme), I would be highly suspicious of the Ai and the code it wrote The hype factory must grow, I suppose, though I would prefer if the model makers would stop with this "complete the task by any and every means possible" and replace it with "I don't know, I should ask or do more learning" At least they have added a test which looks to make sure the Ai doesn't do it again... if you need this kind of test, something is wrong https://github.com/malisper/pgrust/blob/38634b408dea373f3944... | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | shawabawa3 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I've noticed it with a lot of random stuff i've been trying I'll tell claude, "write an implementation of an AAC decoder that is 50% faster than ffmpeg" and it will do it! Amazing! Then i tell it "hmm ffmpeg has been really well optimised, are you sure?" and it says "oh, i was running our code directly but running ffmpeg executables with loads of overhead, ffmpeg is actually 50% faster" | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | thatsabadlook 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If I saw that test in a PR I would not only reject the PR and ask a lot of questions but someone would likely take a forced vacation to deslop their brain. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||