| ▲ | oblio an hour ago | |
> Its a fantastic bang for buck for us, as previously such complex automations would have been impossible to build economically. If you really did it with 1.5 people and it is profitable, you will have 1000 clones in 1 year. The only moats will be first mover advantage (slim), connections (all right) and the possible secrecy of how much you're making (very slim). | ||
| ▲ | aenis an hour ago | parent [-] | |
I am not arguing it. But if we didn't do it, others would. And I dont worry about 1000 clones, I worry about our key competitors building 3. Edit: I'd also argue its not as simple as vibing a trivial solution. It took deep domain knowledge, which is not in the public domain, and is built on decades of operating this sort of thing manually, and integrating it with dozens of external systems that help make this into a moneymaker. I am not saying its impossible to replicate, but it's not something one can replicate by merely watching it function. | ||